On 07/01/2013 03:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > With the do_bootm_states re-organization, we have the call to any > potential sub-commands in a single spot. If one fails, we can then stop > right there and return to the caller. Prior to these calls we have > already ensured that ret is zero so we will not be returning this error > for some other case. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com>
Tested-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.de...@googlemail.com> on avr32 > --- > common/cmd_bootm.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
