On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>wrote:
> On 07/30/2013 03:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org > > <mailto:swar...@wwwdotorg.org>> wrote: > ... > > I think when init_sequence_f[] is running, there may be no serial > > console to report errors. If so, moving the I2C initialization to > that > > early point sounds like a really bad idea. > > > > > > Not really - when you see the U-Boot banner the console is working, and > > we clearly see the U-Boot banner before i2c init happens. > > I thought it got buffered up and only actually sent to the UART much > later, and not in the case when something failed since U-Boot wouldn't > get that far? Or, did that proposal get shot down? > There is an option to buffer output until console_init_f() is called, but that is called very early...
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
