Vivek On 07/31/2013 08:55 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote: <snip> > Did you have an updated patch set for the xHCI code? > At this point of time, we would have one or two fixes on top of this > version of patches for xHCI. > I can post those patches patches based on this series, so that you can > just pick up those. But they are > more of some BUG case handling and all.
Great! Please cc me on these and I can pick them up directly. I have one change in the xhci.h file where I had to add the #include <asm/io.h> Because readl and writel were giving me an implicit declaration warning when building. I have other comments on the code but nothing operational more nit picky. I will wait for the updated patchset >> I have a working implementation on top of this patchset for the OMAP5 device. > Great!! so may be once you are ready you can post, and i can add the > exynos part to the dwc3 and test things at my end. Well for now we can keep the dwc code where it is in the processor specific files. The dwc work will take a little bit of time and I would prefer to have the xHCI stack pulled in and rework the omap and exynos xhci files when the dwc code was brought in. >> So we probably should go with this patch set instead of trying to back port >> the full xHCI stack from the kernel. > Cool. > >> Dan >> >> -- >> ------------------ >> Dan Murphy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> U-Boot mailing list >> U-Boot@lists.denx.de >> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > > -- ------------------ Dan Murphy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
