On 07/31/2013 02:31 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Am 31.07.2013 10:16, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: >> On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:36:19 +0200, Heiko Schocher<h...@denx.de> wrote: ... >>>> In the present instance, I'd rather we either: >>>> >>>> - removed dependency on DT etc. by using "hard-coded" low level I2C >>>> reads for those boards that need it (I assume that for each of >>>> these >>>> boards the I2C slave, offset, and length to read are constant) >>>> in _f >>>> phase, or >>> >>> But DT is used for initializing the i2c driver in tegra ... >> >> Alright, out goes this proposal. Anyway, I didn't like it best. :) > > Yes. > >>>> - parsed the _f phase looking for offending functions or calls which >>>> write to .data or .bss and fix them, suffixing them with _f; in >>>> essence, that amounts to starting the implementation of my >>>> suggestion >>>> above alongside fixing the issue at hand. >>>> >>>> The first approach is rather "let's bring the thing back up first", so >>>> it does not have my preference, but I would understand the need to >>>> quickly fix things. >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> The second approach seems to be going in the same direction as Heiko's >>>> proposal of 07:52 +0200, which I thus second provided it is applicable >>>> to all the boards Wolfgang had in mind. >>> >>> Lets do us this step as fixup ;-) >> >> Alright too. :) > > Ok. > > @Stephen, Simon: Could anyone from you do this 2 steps?
Sorry, I really can't tell which 2 steps you mean? I don't see any email in any timezone with minutes==:52... _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot