Hi Paul, On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Paul B. Henson <hen...@acm.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:10:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > But which board does it actually break, please? > > I don't think any of the default configs included in u-boot would have > broken, while some of them define CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE, none of them > define CONFIG_SILENT_U_BOOT_ONLY. I was working with a freescale mx28evk > prototyping something that will eventually be a custom board, and I > modified the config to drop u-boot output but not drop the linux kernel > output. It was working fine with a git checkout from late May, and I > noticed when I tried out the latest release it wouldn't compile anymore > as it tried to call a symbol that was never defined. > > So it was really only broken for a custom config, but as the behavior is > documented in doc/README.silent, I assume it's still desirable for it to > work :). > OK, well at least that explains why I didn't see the problem. Thanks. > > Thanks... > Regards, Simon
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot