On 08/13/2013 08:38 AM, Bo Shen wrote:
> add gpio common API support for gpio command
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.s...@atmel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c
> index 15f396f..3de0844 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c
> @@ -363,3 +363,46 @@ int at91_get_pio_value(unsigned port, unsigned pin)
>
> return pdsr != 0;
> }
> +
> +/* Common GPIO API */
> +
> +#define at91_gpio_to_port(gpio) (gpio / 32)
> +#define at91_gpio_to_pin(gpio) (gpio % 32)
> +
> +int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
> +{
> + at91_set_pio_input(at91_gpio_to_port(gpio),
> + at91_gpio_to_pin(gpio), 0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
> +{
> + at91_set_pio_output(at91_gpio_to_port(gpio),
> + at91_gpio_to_pin(gpio), value);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> +{
> + return (int) at91_get_pio_value(at91_gpio_to_port(gpio),
> + at91_gpio_to_pin(gpio));
why cast to int here?
> +}
> +
> +int gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> +{
> + at91_set_pio_value(at91_gpio_to_port(gpio),
> + at91_gpio_to_pin(gpio), value);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
Great, I love this. But wasn't there some define for generic GPIO?
Shouldn't we encapsulate this API into this other define?
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
