Hi Simon,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Rajeshwari S Shinde < > rajeshwar...@samsung.com> wrote: > > > When variable size SPL is used, the BL1 expects the SPL to be > > encapsulated differently: instead of putting the checksum at a fixed > > offset in the SPL blob, prepend the blob with a header including the > > size and the checksum. > > > > The enhancements include > > - adding a command line option, '--vs' to indicate the need for > the > > variable size encapsulation > > - padding the fixed size encapsulated blob with 0xff instead of > > random > > memory contents > > - do not silently truncate the input file, report error instead > > - no need to explicitly closing files/freeing memory, this all > > happens > > on exit; removing cleanups it makes code clearer > > - profuse commenting > > - modify Makefile to allow enabling the new feature per board > > > > Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vben...@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari S Shinde <rajeshwar...@samsung.com> > > > > Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > Will 5250 support variable-sized SPL also? > I have tested variable size support for 5420 as have bl1 image supporting variable size for same. I don't have a bl1 image supporting variable size for 5250, but it boots fine without vriable size support even after applying this patch. -- Regards, Rajeshwari Shinde > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > >
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
