Hi Bo Shen,
Thanks for the check, please see below.
On 28.10.2013 05:57, Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Mateusz Kulikowski,
Add Andreas in loop.
On 10/28/2013 03:34, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
(...)
+ /*
+ * Disable pull-up on:
+ * RXDV (PC25) => PHY normal mode (not Test mode)
+ * ERX0 (PE25) => PHY ADDR0
+ * ERX1 (PE26) => PHY ADDR1 => PHYADDR = 0x0
+ *
+ * PHY has internal pull-down
+ */
+ writel(1 << 25, &pio->pioc.pudr);
+ writel((1 << 25) | (1 << 26), &pio->pioe.pudr);
Use GPIO API instead of hard code.
Should I also update (in separate patch) at91sam9263ek board
(code is the same there, bad side is - I don't have that board to test)?
+
+#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x23f00000
This address should be considered as u-boot is top down map, so if your system
only 64MiB, there is only 1MiB left.
I don't understand something here:
- this address is hardcoded in AT91bootstrap (as well as image size - 0x31000),
- I can change it, but it will not boot on "stock" board - should we force
people to recompile AT91bootstrap if they want to use new U-Boot?
or
- Should I add low-level initialization to boot U-Boot from Dataflash
without AT91bootstrap (this is a bit more work)?
or
- There is another way I'm not aware of (perhaps relocate U-Boot in RAM)?
Best Regards,
Mateusz Kulikowski
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
