Hello Tom,
Am 29.10.2013 12:30, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
Hello Igor,
Am 29.10.2013 12:07, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
On 10/28/13 08:19, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Igor,
Am 27.10.2013 08:30, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
Hi Heiko,
On 10/22/13 11:03, Heiko Schocher wrote:
- add omap24xx driver to new multibus/multiadpater support
- adapted all config files, which uses this driver
Tested on the am335x based siemens boards rut, dxr2 and pxm2
posted here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/263211/
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<h...@denx.de>
Tested-by: Tom Rini<tr...@ti.com>
Cc: Lars Poeschel<poesc...@lemonage.de>
Cc: Steve Sakoman<sako...@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Weber<we...@corscience.de>
Cc: Tom Rix<tom....@windriver.com>
Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas<nota...@gmail.com>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra<eballe...@iseebcn.com>
Cc: Luca Ceresoli<luca.ceres...@comelit.it>
Cc: Igor Grinberg<grinb...@compulab.co.il>
Cc: Ilya Yanok<ya...@emcraft.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic<sba...@denx.de>
Cc: Nishanth Menon<n...@ti.com>
Cc: Pali Rohár<pali.ro...@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Barada<peter.bar...@logicpd.com>
Cc: Nagendra T S<nagen...@mistralsolutions.com>
Cc: Michael Jones<michael.jo...@matrix-vision.de>
Cc: Raphael Assenat<r...@8d.com>
[...]
[...]
diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
index 02ffbb1..a07559d 100644
--- a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
+++ b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
#ifndef _EEPROM_
#define _EEPROM_
-#ifdef CONFIG_DRIVER_OMAP34XX_I2C
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_OMAP34XX
int cm_t3x_eeprom_read_mac_addr(uchar *buf);
u32 cm_t3x_eeprom_get_board_rev(void);
#else
Please, rebase on top of:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275284/
which should be applied any time soon.
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Igor Grinberg<grinb...@compulab.co.il>
Hmm.. I cannot see, that your patch is accepted ... but I looked in it,
and it looks good to me. So, I propose to add this patch to the i2c tree,
so I do the necessary changes in my patch when applying it to the
i2c tree (as they are trivial changes) ...
Well, I have no problem with that, but we need to take into account
that there are several more patches (unrelated to i2c) on the mailing
list waiting for approval/apply and depend on my series.
Ok.
@Tom: Is this OK for you?
I think, it would be better to apply my series to u-boot-ti and you can
pull from it to the i2c tree?
Hmm.. u-boot-i2c is based on u-boot.git not on u-boot-ti, and I did
not want to change this. I can of course rebase my patch against u-boot-ti
when Tom added your patch to u-boot-ti and resend it, and tom pick up my
patch ...
Tom, what do you think?
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
