On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar, > > In message <AEA791B2-2BC0-49F7-9152- > acf6ca567...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: >> >>> I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong >>> list >>> with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need >>> sum >>> grouping / structuring. >>> >>> IMHO there should be several options: >>> >>> - for those who look for a board name, we should support this, >>> probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case >>> insensitive) of the board name. >>> >>> like this: => board name => M => MPC837XERDB >>> >>> - alternatively, it should be possible to restrict the choice by >>> selecting first processor architecture (ARM, PowerPC, MIPS, ...), >>> then CPU (family) name, then board names. >>> >>> like this: => Architecture => PPC => MPC83xx => MPC837XERDB >> >> I vote for the second one. > > You misunderstant what I meant. I don't think of havon one or the > other of these options, but of offering *both* of them, so the user > can chose one of the ways, whatever suits best for his current > situation.
Oh, I dont know if we can do that in Kconfig w/o duplicating the option which I think Kconfig would get unhappy about. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot