On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Vadim Bendebury (вб) <vben...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Otavio Salvador > <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Vadim Bendebury (вб) >> <vben...@google.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Otavio Salvador >>> <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>>> Once I saw this announcement I thought the same thing as Albert: how >>>> custodians will have their trees there? >>>> >>> >>> It is easy to create multiple projects, one per custodian. >> >> Yes but than Tom would need to send another branch for review or >> directly push into master? >> > > I am not sure what would be the best way of doing it, but the bottom > line is that there still would be multiple git repos with chunks of > code going upstream once accepted by custodians. > >> Besides, how people will 'transfer' one patch from one tree to >> another? This will happen quite often as someone mistakenly sending a >> patch for the wrong tree or custodians wanting the set to go together >> in a single merge... >> > > How is it handled today? Gerrit is after all just a means of keeping > track of patches in a more efficient way, the rest could be similar to > what is in use now, or enhanced using gerrit's features.
Currently it is just reassigned in Patchwork; using multiple trees will complicate this. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Gerrit, I am just trying to bring up the problems/issues we need to find solutions to be able to use/try it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot