On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:07:59AM +1100, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi All, > > You do all realise that we are going about this, to use some British > vernacular, arse-about-tit > > Everyone agrees that the current U-Boot review workflow 'has issues' (and > has had issues for quite some time). The first attempt at overcoming these > issues was Patchwork. I personally think that that ended up being far less > successful than we hoped
Maybe it's time to swing around back and talk about what's wrong with our current tools then. What I don't like about patchwork: - Some patches just don't make it in. - Sometimes discussions can be a bit hard to follow there, but that's what real mail list archives are for. That's it. The queue can get unwieldy if you don't check the unassigned patches daily, but I don't see how another tool is going to fix the underlying problem of people not using the tool frequently. What I like about patchwork: - Bundles. - Everything is mailbox format / git am'able. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
