On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 04:09 +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote: > > From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com] > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 19:03 +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote: > > > @@ -763,77 +903,47 @@ static void __maybe_unused > > omap_free_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd) > > > * @eccstrength - the number of bits that could be corrected > > > * (1 - hamming, 4 - BCH4, 8 - BCH8, 16 - BCH16) > > > */ > > > -void omap_nand_switch_ecc(uint32_t hardware, uint32_t eccstrength) > > > +int __maybe_unused omap_nand_switch_ecc(uint32_t hardware, > > uint32_t eccstrength) > > > { > > > struct nand_chip *nand; > > > struct mtd_info *mtd; > > > + struct nand_bch_priv *bch; > > > + int err = 0; > > > > bch gives unused warning > > > Sorry, I would have missed it.. I would clean this.
If that's the only issue, I can resolve it when applying. > > I tried to see if the warning goes away later, but patch 3/4 doesn't > > apply cleanly. What tree is this patchset against? > > > These patches should apply cleanly on > git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git master > Do you have any other tree on which you want me to re-base ? Never mind -- I had some old reject files that made me think the conflict was in files that I hadn't touched yet (such as omap_gpmc.c), but the only conflict was in include/config/tricorder.h which I had touched in an earlier patch. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
