> -----Original Message----- > From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 11:05 AM > To: U-Boot user list; Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; > Premi, Sanjeev; Tom Rix > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > Subject: Re: OMAP3: Pending patches > > > Short status update after scanning the recent mails: > > Dirk Behme wrote: > > > > To avoid loosing the overview, here my list of pending > OMAP3 patches > > ready to be applied. From my point of view there are no > open comments on > > these which will prevent to apply them. But please correct if I > > overlooked anything or add what (patches? comments?) I missed. > > > > 1. OMAP3: Beagle: Set pinmux conditionally for Rev C boards > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051013.html > > > > 2. OMAP3: Remove legacy NAND defines > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050882.html > > > > 3. OMAP3: Fix timer handling to 1ms and CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000 > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051178.html > > > > 4. OMAP3: Fix changed mmc init command > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051179.html > > > > 5. OMAP3: Remove unused board-types > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051338.html > > We will try to switch to > > print_cpuinfo & checkboard > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051365.html > > Premi: Do you like to have a look? Hopefully it wouldn't be too hard.
[SP] Sure, I will... > > Jean-Christophe: Please fix the "test-only" and add the documentation > as requested by Wolfgang as soon as possible, that we can > safely use it. > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051382.html > > > 6. OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051339.html > > > > 7. Zoom2 respin II (10 patches) > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050863.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050864.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050865.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050866.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050868.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050867.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050869.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050870.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050871.html > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050872.html > > After > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051383.html > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051384.html > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051385.html > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051386.html > > Tom has to check if an update of this series is necessary. > > > Note: There might be some dependencies between some of > these patches. > > Different authors, sent at different time, unfortunately > this can't be > > avoided. So dependent on the order the patches will be > applied, there > > might be some conflicts. Let us know them, we will try to > update/fix > > then as soon as possible! Most probably 5. and 7. will have some > > conflicts, as 5. removes some code 7. assumes it is still > there. If this > > results in a conflict, let us apply the 10 patches from 7. > first and > > then update 5. > > Jean-Christophe: If series 7. needs an update, it would be really > helpful if you could apply the other patches so that updated > 7. can be > rebased against them. This will reduce the risk of conflicts. > > Dirk > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot