Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear David Brownell, > > In message <200904250105.41050.davi...@pacbell.net> you wrote: >> Yes. The issue is needing to guess what's up ... so for >> example, I seem to observe that "merge window closed" must >> not be the same as "first RC is out", which isn't how the >> Linux process works. But that's the only example I've >> seen for how the new u-boot cycles should work... > > Maybe I pout a little more meaning in the words "release candiate". > After the end of a merge window, there is usually still a long > backlog of patches that has not been merged, and after that there are > several rounds of debugging / bug fixing needed. IMO it makes little > sense to call anything in this state a "release candiate". > > That's why we still have no "rc" in the current release cycle. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk
Make sense on "rc" not really being a release candidate. How about tagging "mc" for "Merge Closed"? gvb _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot