Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 17:29 Tue 21 Apr , Dirk Behme wrote: >> From: Manikandan Pillai <mani.pil...@ti.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.be...@googlemail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai <mani.pil...@ti.com> >> --- > as Request precedently switch to 12Mhz source clock or
As answered already in (unanswered) http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050078.html switch to 12MHz will have a larger code and implementation impact while we won't win anything compared to well tested 13MHz usage http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051258.html > please specify the timer resolution & precision of your implementation and > put in the commit message & code It seems to me that you mix here OMAP1 and OMAP3 patches? I remember about http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051271.html which is regarding arm925/OMAP1 changes, not OMAP3 patch. I can't remember anything similar regarding OMAP3 patch. And similar comment for OMAP3 patch wouldn't make sense as http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051178.html has clear info + * We run the counter with 13MHz, divided by 8, resulting in timer + * frequency of 1.625MHz. With 32bit counter register, counter + * overflows in ~44min Dirk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
