On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:26:24PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > For standalone images, bootm had a special case where the OS boot function > was NULL but did actually exist. It was just called manually. > > This was removed by commit 35fc84fa which checks for the non-existence of > this function before the special case is examined. > > There is no obvious reason why standalone is handled with a special case. > Adjust the code so that standalone has a normal OS boot function. We still > need a special case for when the function returns, but at least we can > avoid the main problem. > > This is intended to fix the reported: > > ERROR: booting os 'U-Boot' (17) is not supported > > but needs testing. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot