On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
<jagannadha.sutradharudu-t...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> Squash the malloc()+memset() combo in favor of calloc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaga...@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> index 1f1bb36..abdb0ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> @@ -381,8 +381,11 @@ int spi_flash_cmd_read_ops(struct spi_flash *flash, u32
> offset,
> }
>
> cmdsz = SPI_FLASH_CMD_LEN + flash->dummy_byte;
> - cmd = malloc(cmdsz);
> - memset(cmd, 0, cmdsz);
> + cmd = calloc(1, cmdsz);
> + if (!cmd) {
> + debug("SF: Failed to allocate cmd\n");
> + return ret;
Shouldn't you return -ENOMEM instead?
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
