On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:55 +0530, Aneesh Bansal wrote: > In case of secure boot, boot from NAND is ramboot. > It was removed by some other commit. So defining it again.
In case of not-secure-boot, it's not ramboot. What user of CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT are you concerned about? Many of them look like this: #elif !defined(CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT) && defined(CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT) ...which doesn't make sense if secure boot is always considered ramboot. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
