David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Ben Warren wrote: > >> The driver has been renamed dm644x_emac.c >> > > Let me suggest "davinci_emac.c" ... the same controller > is in some non-dm644x DaVinci silicon (like dm365), and > a gigabit flavor is in the dm6467 chip. > > > OK. I named it this because the top of the file mentioned it was ripped off from 'dm644x_emac.c' (not Linux) >> >> -COBJS = timer.o ether.o lxt972.o dp83848.o >> +COBJS = timer.o lxt972.o dp83848.o >> SOBJS = lowlevel_init.o reset.o >> > > Given the recent cleanups in cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile, > that won't quite apply. I suggest you pull some of the > changes from arm-next. > OK, I'll look into that. > Procedure note: this is exactly why Linux now has a > shared "-next" tree ... to make sure interdependencies > between development branches can be sorted out before > the next merge window, so the merge window can be spent > addressing more substantive issues (if any). > > Sounds good. I believe there is a 'next' branch on the U-boot mainline, and quite often we do use it, but probably should do so earlier in the process.
Thanks for the help and advice! Ben _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot