Dave,
What I have done is sufficient. A 'dm357.c' file will not be required as
the dm644x.c file will take care of everything. AS long as your patches ensure
that dm644x works, the DM357 will work. This is because DM357 is very similar
to the DM644x. If you want me to put a dm357 file then I will have to make an
exact copy of the Dm6446 file. Similarly if you want me to keep a Dm357 folder
in the board/davinci folder I will copy everything from the dvevm folder.
Thanks,
Sandeep
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 6:00 PM
> To: Paulraj, Sandeep; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM DaVinci: Adding DM357 Support
>
> On Tuesday 28 April 2009, s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
> > Makefile | 3 +
> > include/configs/davinci_dm357_evm.h | 159
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> I believe that will be insufficient with the current
> U-Boot arm-next branch. Won't you also be needing
> a cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm357.c file to handle the
> various ways it differs from a dm6446 chip?
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
