On 01/29/2014 03:07 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Roger
>
> On 01/29/2014 03:16 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> On 01/28/2014 10:01 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Add spl_sata to read a fat partition from a bootable SATA
>>> drive.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> common/Makefile | 3 +++
>>> common/cmd_scsi.c | 2 ++
>>> common/spl/Makefile | 1 +
>>> common/spl/spl.c | 5 +++++
>>> common/spl/spl_sata.c | 51
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/spl.h | 3 +++
>>> spl/Makefile | 1 +
>>> 7 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 common/spl/spl_sata.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile
>>> index 4d99ecd..b0f5b62 100644
>>> --- a/common/Makefile
>>> +++ b/common/Makefile
>>> @@ -201,6 +201,9 @@ ifdef CONFIG_SPL_USB_HOST_SUPPORT
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_SUPPORT) += usb.o usb_hub.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_STORAGE) += usb_storage.o
>>> endif
>>> +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_SATA_SUPPORT
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_SCSI) += cmd_scsi.o
>>> +endif
>>> ifneq ($(CONFIG_SPL_NET_SUPPORT),y)
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE) += env_nowhere.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC) += env_mmc.o
>>> diff --git a/common/cmd_scsi.c b/common/cmd_scsi.c
>>> index 7b97dc9..b3f7687 100644
>>> --- a/common/cmd_scsi.c
>>> +++ b/common/cmd_scsi.c
>>> @@ -168,7 +168,9 @@ removable:
>>> scsi_curr_dev = -1;
>>>
>>> printf("Found %d device(s).\n", scsi_max_devs);
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>>> setenv_ulong("scsidevs", scsi_max_devs);
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>>
>>> int scsi_get_disk_count(void)
>>> diff --git a/common/spl/Makefile b/common/spl/Makefile
>>> index 65a1484f..64569c2 100644
>>> --- a/common/spl/Makefile
>>> +++ b/common/spl/Makefile
>>> @@ -18,4 +18,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_NET_SUPPORT) += spl_net.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT) += spl_mmc.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_SUPPORT) += spl_usb.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT) += spl_fat.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_SATA_SUPPORT) += spl_sata.o
>>> endif
>>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
>>> index 0645cee..774fdad 100644
>>> --- a/common/spl/spl.c
>>> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@ void board_init_r(gd_t *dummy1, ulong dummy2)
>>> spl_usb_load_image();
>>> break;
>>> #endif
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_SATA_SUPPORT
>>> + case BOOT_DEVICE_SATA:
>>> + spl_sata_load_image();
>>> + break;
>>> +#endif
>>> default:
>>> debug("SPL: Un-supported Boot Device\n");
>>> hang();
>>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_sata.c b/common/spl/spl_sata.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..88d6b06
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/common/spl/spl_sata.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * (C) Copyright 2013
>>> + * Texas Instruments, <www.ti.com>
>>> + *
>>> + * Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com>
>>> + *
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>>> + *
>>> + * Derived work from spl_usb.c
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <common.h>
>>> +#include <spl.h>
>>> +#include <asm/u-boot.h>
>>> +#include <sata.h>
>>> +#include <fat.h>
>>> +#include <version.h>
>>> +#include <image.h>
>>> +
>>> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>> +
>>> +void spl_sata_load_image(void)
>>> +{
>>> + int err;
>>> + block_dev_desc_t *stor_dev;
>>> +
>>> + err = init_sata(CONFIG_SPL_SATA_BOOT_DEVICE);
>>> + if (err) {
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>>> + printf("spl: sata init failed: err - %d\n", err);
>> Why the conditional print only if CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT.
>
> As the file header indicates this is a copy/paste of the other SPL files.
>
>>> +#endif
>>> + hang();
>>> + } else {
>>> + /* try to recognize storage devices immediately */
>>> + stor_dev = scsi_get_dev(0);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + debug("boot mode - FAT\n");
>> Do you really need this debug message? If yes could it be more descriptive
>> like printing function name
>> to point out where it comes from?
>
> We really don't need this since only FAT is supported here. I can remove it
> in v2
>
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT
>>> + if (spl_start_uboot() || spl_load_image_fat_os(stor_dev,
>>> +
>>> CONFIG_SYS_SATA_FAT_BOOT_PARTITION))
>>> +#endif
>>> + err = spl_load_image_fat(stor_dev,
>> Do you need to tab space this to align with the above if statement?
>
> Well that depends on if the ifdef is honored. If the SPL_OS_BOOT is not
> defined then this statement is lined
> up properly. if it is defined then it is not. Again this is the precedence
> for the other spl file (mmc and usb)
>
>>
>>> + CONFIG_SYS_SATA_FAT_BOOT_PARTITION,
>>> + CONFIG_SPL_FAT_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME);
>> Just cross checking. If CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT is defined then you need to call
>> both spl_load_image_fat_os() as well as spl_load_image_fat ?
>
> spl_load_image_fat is called within spl_load_image_fat_os.
>
> spl_load_image_fat is only needed to be called if the other functions return
> a failure
>
OK. Thanks for the clarification.
cheers,
-roger
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
