Hi Tom, On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:55:43 -0500, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:51:05PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > Seeing arch/arm/cpu/armv8/config.mk, -mstrict-align option > > was added to both PLATFORM_NO_UNALIGNED and PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS. > > > > $(PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS) is given to all compiled objects. > > Adding the same option to also PLATFORM_NO_UNALIGNED is > > redundant. > > > > For example, common/hush.o was compiled with double -mstrict-align. > > You can comfirm it by checking common/.hush.o.cmd file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> > > Cc: David Feng <feng...@phytium.com.cn> > > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> > > Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> > > With the v3 series about unaligned bits this patch should no longer be > needed. Hmm... This patch is about not repeating -mstrict-align twice, which is a bug unrelated with switching to -mno-unaligned-access. Besides, -mstrict-align means "Don't assume that unaligned accesses are handled", which I think is for aarch64 what -mno-unaligned-access is for arm(32), so it *should* be specified. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
