Hi Tom, On 22 May 2014 14:43, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:34:33AM -1000, Simon Glass wrote: >> +Tom >> >> Hi Heiko, >> >> On 22 May 2014 00:43, Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote: >> > using UBI and DM together leads in compiler error, as >> > both define a "struct device", so rename "struct device" >> > in include/dm/device.h to "struct udevice", as we use >> > linux code (MTD/UBI/UBIFS some USB code,...) and cannot >> > change the linux "struct device" >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> >> > Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >> > Cc: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> >> >> I'm not 100% comfortable with this but if we really want to avoid >> changing kernel code that moves into U-Boot it is either this or a >> '#define device ldevice' at the top of the linux code/in a header. I'm >> not sure which is preferable. >> >> If Tom decides to apply this, I'd like to request that it be done >> soon, since it has wide impact on driver model code. >> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > I like it, I'm going to grab it Monday and I'm going to kick out -rc2 on > Monday as well, which should be a semi-handy branching off point too > then.
Thanks, that sounds good. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
