Hi Stefano On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: >> On 16/06/2014 02:46, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> There are board were we cannot do voltage negotiation but want to set >>> the VSELECT bit forcely to ensure it to work at 1.8V. >>> >>> This commit adds CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_FORCE_VSELECT flag for this use. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> >>> --- >>> >>> drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 4 ++++ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c >>> index c75b38f..b3870e2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c >>> @@ -517,6 +517,10 @@ static int esdhc_init(struct mmc *mmc) >>> /* Set timout to the maximum value */ >>> esdhc_clrsetbits32(®s->sysctl, SYSCTL_TIMEOUT_MASK, 14 << 16); >>> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_FORCE_VSELECT >>> + esdhc_setbits32(®s->vendorspec, ESDHC_VENDORSPEC_VSELECT); >>> +#endif >> >> Instead of adding a new compiler switch that should be documented (I >> have already read Marek's comments), what do you think to extend struct >> fsl_esdhc_cfg, putting for exmaple an "options" field with this kind of >> specialization ? > > I will try to cook something in this direction. >
Well I already said some emails ago ;). Michael > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com | _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot