Hello Daniel,

On 26-07-14 22:50, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
Hi Jeroen,

2014-07-26 21:39 GMT+02:00 Jeroen Hofstee <dasub...@myspectrum.nl>:
Hello Daniel,


On 26-07-14 20:54, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
MAINTAINERS contains all currently known custodians based on
infos from wiki [1] and u-boot git forks [2].

[1] http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Custodians
[2] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=forks

Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierz...@gmail.com>
---

   MAINTAINERS | 338
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 338 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644 MAINTAINERS

huh, has this not already been refused several times in the past?

according to [1] we want to have one top-level MAINTAINERS for the
custodians and multiple MAINTAINERS files per board (will be added
with the Kconfig patch series)

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/185242/focus=185899


Ah my bad, I interpreted this as yet another way to track maintainers.
But it seems you are at least aware the KConfig patchset also carry
such patches, so it likely is fine. Sorry for the noise.

Regards,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to