On Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 06:41:26 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > Isn't MX6SX ARMv7 with 64-byte cacheline alignment anyway ? So isn't > > there something completely else broken on MX6SX ? > > Thanks for the review, Marek. > > Inspecting this further I think the correct fix would be: > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h > index 2631beb..e9e6f63 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > > #define ARCH_MXC > > -#define CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE 32 > +#define CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE 64
Well yeah, it would ;-) Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot