Kazuaki Ichinohe wrote: > >But, other local, private, resource management structures are encouraged > >to be shrinked/optimized, as it's just waste of ROM space. > > Originally U-boot of PowerPC is not importance for the size because the size > is large. > I will point out and object about you.
As said before, I'm fine with this driver as is. I've just pointed out it has bunch of unused struct members in it. > It is important to maintain interchangeability with the Linux kernel driver. > It is important that maintenance is good. Hm, I don't see any good aspects with doing so, but that's also fine with me. -- Shinya Kuribayashi NEC Electronics _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
