On Monday, October 20, 2014 at 04:53:15 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
[...]
> > -#define ALTERA_SPI_RXDATA 0
> > -#define ALTERA_SPI_TXDATA 4
> > -#define ALTERA_SPI_STATUS 8
> > -#define ALTERA_SPI_CONTROL 12
> > -#define ALTERA_SPI_SLAVE_SEL 20
> > +struct altera_spi_regs {
> > + u32 rxdata;
> > + u32 txdata;
> > + u32 status;
> > + u32 control;
> > + u32 _reserved;
> > + u32 slave_sel;
> > +};
>
> Can you place this structure definition below of all macro defines, i
> don't think the
> next level patches does that, does they?
Does it make sense to you, to first define the bits in registers and then
the register layout ? It does not make sense to me, so I would prefer to
keep it like it is.
[...]
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
