Hi, On 9 October 2014 21:44, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > HI Hans, > > On 9 October 2014 02:13, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10/09/2014 09:59 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 13:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>>> Any more comments on this series please? I have a few nits so could >>>> respin. >>> >>> I'm afraid I'm unlikely to get to look at this before the w/e. It looks >>> like the majority of the series isn't actually about sunxi though? >> >> Right, could v2 please be split into a generic series and a sunxi series >> on top of that, so that Ian and I can focus on reviewing the sunxi bits, >> and the wider community can hopefully review the generic bits ? > > Yes I can split it - there are an unusual number of additional patches > as sunxi was the point at which I finally decided to change the > uclass. > >> >>> Without having looked at the specifics I can say I'm broadly in favour >>> of moving towards Device Model / Device Tree. >> >> Ack. > > OK good. I think there will be benefits, even if they are thin on the > ground with just these two drivers.
I'm going to apply the non-sunxi patches to dm/master soon - please let me know if there are any comments. For sunxi I have sent v2 for review. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
