On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:04:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > > > soon. > > > > > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > > > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > > > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > > > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > > > > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > > > blackfin: + ip04 > > > arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > > > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt > > > tricorder_flash cm_t3517 > > > > there must be something wrong: > > Compiler fun! With Linaro 2013.03 gcc 4.7.3 we're 260 bytes over the > limit on SPL. With ELDK 5.4's 4.7.x we're 543 bytes under the limit. > What I think I had been thinking was that you could move > CONFIG_SPL_STACK into DDR and bump the max size a bit or based on > CONFIG_FLASHCARD or not build NAND or MMC into MLO but not both (and > that'd be a bigger size savings). > > Or maybe the answer is that I need to stop using that Linaro toolchain > for 4.7.x testing.
... ELDK 5.5.x also has a similar slight size overflow and is 4.8.x. I guess for now I'll default to use ELDK 5.4 for ARM but people may need to consider a something-something for newer toolchains sooner rather than later. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
