On 10 December 2014 at 08:55, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > There seem to be a few EEPROM drivers around - perhaps we should have a > single standard one? This simple driver is used for sandbox testing, but > could be pressed into more active service. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> > Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> > --- > > Changes in v6: None > Changes in v5: None > Changes in v4: None > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: > - Update commit message for EEPROM driver > > drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c | 51 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/dm/uclass-id.h | 1 + > include/i2c_eeprom.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c > create mode 100644 include/i2c_eeprom.h
Applied to u-boot-dm. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot