On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 08:57 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > I also pushed my tree to gitorious: > > https://gitorious.org/ijc/u-boot jetson-psci-v1 > > > > I would Ack your patch, but I don't think you've posted it and it has no > > S-o-b so that would seem a bit premature/rude of me. For the same reason > > I've not actually included it in the series posted (but it is in the > > gitorious branch). > > Feel free to take ownership of that patch. I currently don't have the > time to work on this and it seems you've made good progress on it.
Will do. Could you offer a S-o-b for it please so I can pick it up. > It could probably use some cleanup because there's a bit of debug output > still in there. Also... > > > FWIW I think you could drop your stub versions of psci_cpu_off and > > psci_cpu_suspend (assuming you don't want to implement them) since the > > common code has stubs. > > ... I'd think you'd need to implement these so that you can get proper > suspend/resume support in the kernel. I've had to disable cpuidle (via > #undef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP in arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra114.c) in the > kernel to make that code not powergate CPUs. Ideally I think the kernel > would check that it's running with PSCI support and disable the cpuidle > driver. Maybe that could be done by introducing a new cpuidle driver > that checks for PSCI availability and uses it when present. Hrm, I'm not sure how this all fits together, it's not a problem I've noted before. FWIW I think cpu_off and cpu_suspend are optional in PSCI v0.1 so an initial version doesn't necessarily need to implement them (sunxi doesn't for example), but as you say they do enable useful features. > Adding Stephen and Tom for visibility. Oops, sorry, I got them for the patches (via docs/git-mailrc) but forgot about the cover letter. Ian. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot