Hi, On 01/15/2015 10:31 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote: > Moving exynos5420_get_pll_clk function definition up in the > code to keep it together with rest of SoC_get_pll_clk functions. > This makes code more legible and also removes the need of > declaration when called before the position of definition in > code. Also, renaming exynos5420_get_pll_clk to > exynos542x_get_pll_clk because it is being used for both Exynos > 5420 and 5800. > > Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <aksha...@samsung.com> > --- > Changes since v1: > - New patch. > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 82 > +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > index 519928c..6a1b05f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > @@ -267,6 +267,46 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_pll_clk(int pllreg) > return fout; > } > > +/* exynos5420: return pll clock frequency */
exynos5420 -> exynos542x Thanks. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
