On 22/06/2009 20:04, Scott Wood wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> no as you add the nand in this patch >> the nand need to be add in a seperate patch, >> this one need to only add the s3c2440 support >> and the nand will be handle by Scott the nand Maintainer > > If a NAND patch is sandwiched in the middle of other patches that need > to go via an arch tree, and depends on some of those patches, I'd rather > ack the NAND bits to go through the arch tree rather than try to merge > everything separately while still maintaining dependencies. In that > case, keeping the NAND bits in a separate patch is nice, but not > mandatory IMHO. >
Thanks, leaving the NAND changes in the arch-specific patch would be simpler for me. I have to make some changes to the SBC2440 patch anyway so I'll make sure I cc you when I re-send it. > I'll look at that patch soon. > > -Scott > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4179 (20090622) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot