On 01/24/2015 11:11 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
This commit moves files as follows:
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra20/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/*
...
Bikeshed: I know that this matches what the Linux kernel has for 32-bit
ARM, but I've always disliked using the word "machine" to describe an
SoC. Would just "tegra" or "soc-tegra" be better than "mach-tegra"? Feel
free to entirely ignore this though; I don't feel too strongly.
Oh and one more thing: We're starting to work on 64-bit Tegra support in
the Linux kernel. A fair amount of the code moved by this patch is
likely to apply on both 32-bit and 64-bit Tegra. Will arch/arm support
64-bit within U-Boot, or will there be a separate directory for 32- and
64-bit ARM? If so, should this code all be moved to something more like
soc/tegra/... or drivers/tegra/... or drivers/soc/tegra/... or ... so it
can be shared between the architectures?
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
