On 02/25/2015 05:54 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 24 February 2015 at 17:06, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 02/24/2015 04:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> On 24 February 2015 at 14:08, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This series performs a few small cleanups to or parameterizations of the
>>>> existing Tegra pinmux driver, and adds Tegra210 support. The Tegra210
>>>> code isn't actually used yet, since the balance of the Tegra210 support
>>>> is not yet present. However, it should start appearing soon.
...
>>>> Stephen Warren (9):
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: add note re: drive group field defines
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: simplify some defines
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: handle feature removal on newer SoCs
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: move some type definitions
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: partially handle varying register layouts
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: support hsm/schmitt on pins
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: account for different drivegroup base registers
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: support Tegra210's e_io_hv pin option
>>>>    ARM: tegra: pinmux: add Tegra210 support
>>>
>>> Does the Linux side look similar to this? The use of #defines seem
>>> like a potential temporary solution but I hope it doesn't stay that
>>> way.
...
>> The Linux side was already a bit more parameterized, so the Tegra210 support
>> series doesn't have as many patches as the U-Boot series. However, that
>> comes at the cost of the per-SoC "drivers" having much larger data tables,
>> so I don't expect we'd want to adopt in U-Boot the same level of driver
>> parameterization as Linux.
> 
> I see - do you know how much bigger the tables are?

Kernel per-SoC files:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  25532    1068       0   26600    67e8 pinctrl-tegra30.o
  18744    1032       0   19776    4d40 pinctrl-tegra114.o
  19868    1128       0   20996    5204 pinctrl-tegra124.o
  16296     972       0   17268    4374 pinctrl-tegra210.o

U-Boot per-SoC files, although these could actually be reduced to zero
if we re-wrote the per-board pinmux tables to use FUNC0..3 enums (i.e.
raw HW register mux values) and hence got rid of the need to map a mux
enum to FUNC0..3 values. Auto-generation of the per-board files would
make pretty easy, if all boards were in tegra-pinmux-scripts.

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
    996       4       0    1000     3e8 .../tegra30/pinmux.o
   1036       4       0    1040     410 .../tegra114/pinmux.o
   1076       4       0    1080     438 .../tegra124/pinmux.o
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to