On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:55 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Peng, > > > > On Mar 11, 2015, at 04:17 , Peng Fan <peng....@freescale.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, Marek > > > > On 3/11/2015 10:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 01:58:37 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > > > > Hi, Marek > > > Hi! > > > > > > > On 3/10/2015 9:45 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 08:35:46 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > > > > > > Commit f022d36e8a4517b2a9d25ff2d75bd2459d0c68b1 introduces > > > > > > error register offset. > > > > > > > > > > > > Change the "char reserved3[59]" to "char reserved3[56]". > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng....@freescale.com> > > > > > This should probably be applied to 2015.04 . > > > > > > > > > > What are the symptoms of this bug please ? > > > > I just found the reserved3 size is wrong, did not do test. > > > > From the driver, only the entry 'scr' of fsl_esdhc below reserved3 is > > > > used, so the offset of scr is wrong if using `char reserved3[59]` > > > Uh, is the patch tested at all on real hardware ? > > Still not test on real hardware. From commit > > f022d36e8a4517b2a9d25ff2d75bd2459d0c68b1, > > " > > uint adsaddr; /* ADMA system address register */ > > - char reserved2[160]; /* reserved */ > > + char reserved2[100]; /* reserved */ > > + uint vendorspec; /* Vendor Specific register */ > > + char reserved3[59]; /* reserved */ > > uint hostver; /* Host controller version register */ > > " > > It's clear that 160 bytes does not equal with (100 + 4 + 59)bytes. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Marek Vasut > > Regards, > > Peng. > > Although I agree with fixing this, I’m kinda scared about how fragile structs > for describing hardware > registers are. > > But we’re stuck with it I guess. >
Without this patch my emmc (T1042)is broken beyond repair, please commit. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot