On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:34:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 2015-03-11 um 16:11 schrieb Tom Rini: > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:11AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > >> This is already invoked a few cycles later in monitor mode by > >> _secure_monitor. Drop it here, it serves no purpose. > > > > For clarity, because of the vector tables? > > Sorry, didn't get the question yet. Are you asking why it was added > initially (that would be a question for Marc) or why it serves no > purpose now?
You're saying we can drop the call to that function from where it was because it's called a few cycles later. In mainline we would only (as far as I can see) call the function because the CPU went to the vector table and called it that way. Or rather, I'm unclear as to how the function would be called a few cycles later, can you please expand the commit message to make it clearer? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
