On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:18:01AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:18AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > > > In this case the secure code lives in RAM, and hence the memory node in > > > the device tree needs to be adjusted. This avoids that the OS will map > > > and possibly access the reservation. > > > > > > Add support for setting CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_RESERVE_SIZE to carve out > > > such a region. We only support cutting off memory from the beginning or > > > the end of a RAM bank as we do not want to increase their number (which > > > would happen if punching a hole) for simplicity reasons > > > > > > This will be used in a subsequent patch for Jetson-TK1. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/virt-dt.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > My concern here is that this looks a lot like things we would re-use on > > armv8 and we're making them potentially needlessly v7-centric. If > > nothing else, the function names should be generic and this be the v7 > > implementation of them, yes? > > In my opinion it's fine to go along with this and then refactor things > once we have an ARMv8 board that makes use of this.
I'll live with it then but I expect the time to refactor things to approach really quickly too. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
