On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:57:09PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:54:26PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:47:24PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:36:54PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: > > > > On ARM v7M, the processor will return to ARM mode when executing > > > > a blx instruction with bit 0 of the address == 0. Always set it > > > > > > but that's what the 'x' is for, right ? eXchange the CPU mode. > > > > > > > to 1 to stay in thumb mode. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mpor...@konsulko.com> > > > > --- > > > > common/cmd_boot.c | 4 ++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/common/cmd_boot.c b/common/cmd_boot.c > > > > index 8f2e070..20ce652 100644 > > > > --- a/common/cmd_boot.c > > > > +++ b/common/cmd_boot.c > > > > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ static int do_go(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int > > > > argc, char * const argv[]) > > > > * pass address parameter as argv[0] (aka command name), > > > > * and all remaining args > > > > */ > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_V7M > > > > + /* For ARM V7M, set bit zero to stay in Thumb mode */ > > > > + addr++; > > > > +#endif > > > > > > what if we were in ARM state when we reached this point ? You're now > > > telling CPU to always switch to Thumb. Is this really what we want ? > > > > > > From ARM's instruction manual: > > > > > > > > > > > > " > > > The BX and BLX instructions can change the processor state from ARM to > > > Thumb, or from Thumb to ARM. > > > > > > BLX label always changes the state. > > > > > > BX Rm and BLX Rm derive the target state from bit[0] of Rm: > > > > > > if bit[0] of Rm is 0, the processor changes to, or remains in, ARM > > > state > > > > > > if bit[0] of Rm is 1, the processor changes to, or remains in, Thumb > > > state. > > > " > > > > oh wait, this is cortex-m, it's supposed to be thumb2 only, why do we > > even need that bit ? > > seems like it must be set for cortex-m, but then shouldn't this be done > by GCC ? Are we, perhaps, using wrong GCC arguments when building for > cortex-m ?
From "make V=1":
... -march=armv7-m -mthumb ...
$ arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
...
gcc version 4.8.3 20140913 (release) (4.8.3-11ubuntu1+11)
-Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
