Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,

In message <1247084077-12867-1-git-send-email-plagn...@jcrosoft.com> you wrote:
> This patch allow to overwrit the libgcc Makefile inclusion from the toplevel

overwrite

> Makefile by the arch_config.mk files. This is in preparation for the ARM
> architecture to move away from including libgcc function and only using
> self-contained U-Boot functions as done in Linux.
> 
> Currently all the ARM boards that use the nand are broken due to the adding of
> the 64 Bit device size support. In the past we have seen problems with 
> different
> toolchains due to EABI, FPU as example.

tool chains

> With this patch and the following one we move away from all these problems and

"the following one" makes no sense. After comitting the patch, nobody
knows what "the following one" might have been - even now I don't know
what you are referring to.

> we will be able to have full control to have a functions embedded into u-boot.

This sentence makes no sense to me either.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
The high cost of living hasn't affected its popularity.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to