On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 4 June 2015 at 17:48, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference > >> between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree. > >> This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example. > > > > I'd like to apply some of these - they are assigned to you in > > patchwork. I need to be a little careful with the device tree SPL > > change to make sure it does not affect any existing boards (and do a > > final test with the boards I have). Is this OK with you or would you > > prefer to apply some yourself? > > > > For now I don't want to apply all the Rockchip patches, as I have a > > much more functional port now and want to avoid churn. I'll tidy those > > patches up and see how we get them applied later. > > > > [snip] > > I'll go ahead and apply these and send a pull request. It tests out OK > on the platforms I have.
OK, thanks. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
