On 4 July 2015 at 18:23, R, Vignesh <vigne...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On 7/3/2015 7:27 PM, Andy Pont wrote: >> Vignesh wrote... >> >> [snip] >> >>> +#define BIT(x) (1 << (x)) >>> + >> >> Is this not something that would be better in a global header file somewhere >> rather than it starting a trend of a per-driver, per-arch, etc. definitions? > > I agree there are few per arch defintions. > How about adding it to include/linux/bitops.h as in linux kernel?
Patch is under review [1] in fact you may give comment on the same. [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/470478/ thanks! -- Jagan | openedev. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
