Hi Simon,

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 8 July 2015 at 15:07, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On 8 July 2015 at 14:43, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>> +Hans
>>>>
>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>
>>>> On 7 July 2015 at 22:04, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>> For USB Ethernet devices we need to use the usbethaddr environment 
>>>>>> variable
>>>>>> (instead of ethaddr) the Ethernet hardware address. Add this to the 
>>>>>> uclass
>>>>>> so that it happens automatically.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have always thought that this approach of having a separate prefix
>>>>> for usbethaddr was a smelly hack. Are we sure we want to propagate it
>>>>> here? Can we not just use dev->seq? It should already be unique in the
>>>>> DM, right? I was really looking forward to that all going away.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, OK, sorry. Do you think we need a way of specifying the eth
>>>> interface # as we do with aliases at present? We did have one but Han
>>>> has just removed it :-)
>>>
>>> Can you reference where this happened. A quick search didn't turn it up for 
>>> me.
>>>
>>>> Otherwise we'll just end up counting up from the last 'fixed' ethernet
>>>> interface. Maybe that is good enough.
>>>
>>> That's probably good enough, but some may prefer more explicit control.
>>
>> The thread is here:
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/485637/
>>
>> Before, we could I think add USB devices to the device tree and give
>> them a specific number (although I never actually tested it), but that
>> won't work now.
>
> What are you thoughts on this? I'd like to bring this series in soon
> (the parts without rpi anyway).

I don't mind just having "one past wired Eth" as the starting point.
If someone cares about specifying it in the device tree that can be
added later without redoing what you are adding here, right?

Thanks,
-Joe
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to