On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > On 28 July 2015 at 11:45, Otavio Salvador > <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> On 23 July 2015 at 03:36, Chris Packham <judge.pack...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> It could be treated the same way the git project treats gitk and >>>> git-gui. The sources are still included in the main project and >>>> distributed along with the rest of it but they are merged from an >>>> external upstream where the real development happens. The upstream >>>> project is also free to make releases on whatever schedule they >>>> determine (although these days there isn't much development going on >>>> in for gitk/git-gui). >>> >>> That sounds like a useful model. However there are so few patches to >>> patman - is it worth it? >> >> Sure it is; I have asked it in past I think. >> >> I would like to have it in Debian, Arch and other linux distros and >> get more people using it to manage patch series. It is hard to explain >> it can be used for other project it being inside U-Boot source code. > > OK so if we do this, what's the best way to get a repo and a mailing list?
I would try github or kernel.org if possible. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot