Hi Stefano, On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote:
> I have a main question. For i.MX6, we could factorize (mainly thanks > Tim's work) the major SOC variants, getting some important goals, as > having a single u-boot image running on different variations of the same > board. > > This was reached deciding at run time which is the pin, its register and > the value to be written - instead of fixing at build time. > > Exceptions are the SOC that cannot be substitute by another one on the > same board, because they are not pin compatible: for example, MX&SX. > > Now you are introducing the new architecture for MX7, but it looks like > you get rid of these improvements. It can be right or false, then my > questions: > > - has MX7 quite the same variations as MX6 ? I mean a qaud, dual and > solo that are pin-to-pin compatible ? No, mx7 is not pin compatible with the mx6 family. Regards, Fabio Estevam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
