On Friday, August 07, 2015 at 09:33:02 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Peng, Soeren,
Hi, > On 07/08/2015 09:19, Soeren Moch wrote: > > Peng, > > > > Sorry for being unclear here. > > > > In your patch you add several options in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig > > under "MX6 board select". Some of these options are named "Support > > <boardname>" (e.g. "Support udoo"), while others are simply called > > "<boardname>" (e.g. "Bachmann OT1200"). > > > > I would prefer the simple "<boardname>" naming style for all options and > > remove the word "Support" from all description strings. But this is only > > my personal opinion and a minor cosmetic change. > > Checking in other architecture, I see there is no rule about this. Even > in the same Kconfig (AT91), there is a mix with and without "Support". > Both are ok - decide yourself. The "Support" is implicit (you won't select it if you didn't want to support that board, would you?), so please use just the board name. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
