Hi Stephen, On 10 August 2015 at 22:25, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 08/10/2015 10:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 10 August 2015 at 22:00, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >>> On 08/07/2015 07:42 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>>> This updates the device tree from the kernel version to something suitable >>>> for U-Boot: >>>> >>>> - Add stdout-path alias for console >>>> - Mark the /soc node to be available pre-relocation so that the early >>>> serial >>>> console works (we need the 'ranges' property to be available) >>> >>> If you can get these changes into the kernel's copy of the DT, then this >>> patch is fine. If not, I don't think we should take this patch. The very >>> definition of DT is a SW-stack-agnostic data structure. Modifying it on >>> a per-SW-stack basis means we aren't doing DT, but rather something that >>> looks like DT but isn't. In that case, we shouldn't call it DT. >> >> The "u-boot," prefix is intended to indicate that it is >> U-Boot-specific. Linux has "linux," and 800+ uses of it in the ARM >> device tree source files. >> >> I can certainly send this patch to Linux. Given your comment above, >> will you take it? > > Review of that change would have to be by the DT bindings maintainers on > the DT mailing list. Lee Jones (or perhaps Eric Anholt) owns applying > any RPi patches within Linux.
As you saw I sent a patch to that mailing list. Let's see how it goes. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot