On 10 August 2015 at 10:09, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote: > This can be simply written with list_for_each_entry(), maybe > this macro was not necessary in the first place. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> > --- > > include/dm/uclass.h | 9 ++------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > diff --git a/include/dm/uclass.h b/include/dm/uclass.h > index d56877c..d214b88 100644 > --- a/include/dm/uclass.h > +++ b/include/dm/uclass.h > @@ -240,12 +240,7 @@ int uclass_resolve_seq(struct udevice *dev); > * are no more devices. > * @uc: uclass to scan > */ > -#define uclass_foreach_dev(pos, uc) \ > - for (pos = list_entry((&(uc)->dev_head)->next, typeof(*pos), \ > - uclass_node); \ > - prefetch(pos->uclass_node.next), \ > - &pos->uclass_node != (&(uc)->dev_head); \ > - pos = list_entry(pos->uclass_node.next, typeof(*pos), \ > - uclass_node)) > +#define uclass_foreach_dev(pos, uc) \ > + list_for_each_entry(pos, &uc->dev_head, uclass_node) > > #endif > -- > 1.9.1 > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot